That is one of the most often quoted sayings when discussing the right of free speech. And it came from one of the fathers of secular humanism no less.
I was forwarded this next bit from my friend and brother Gordon Watson.
He is a bit of a radical, if you consider being a white christian male radical, who has been defending the rights of the unborn, born and reborn for many years now. When I first heard of him, he was the, in his words, "poster-boy for the pro-life movement". He was frequently interviewed by the Christian media and I recall reading about him in such publications as The Christian Info News.
Well, even thee established oh so politically correct Religious Christian church, note I said "religious", wasn't immune to his critical gaze, and they soon dropped him from the limelight.
He has quite a testimony of being used by Yahwey to "defend the poor and fatherless" and I am pleased to call him my friend.
That said, here is a little bit of where he's at now............
To : Canadians who care about the integrity of government
the comment below, has been emailed and will likely be published on the internet.
I want you to be aware of what I actually wrote, versus the back-channel rumbling and fallout which likely will happen
the person I'm talking about, Terry Tremaine, is the head of the National Socialist Party of Canada. He is a professor ... fired from his position at the U of Saskatchewan, then subsequently hectored through various legal proceedings for his political beliefs. He wound up with an Order from the Cdn Human Rights Commission that he not be allowed to use the internet. He was arrested last week ostensibly for breaching that bail condition, for having posted his defence against another charge he is facing = of "hate speech" section 319 of the Criminal Code
Today he sits in gaol, waiting for the next round of a bail hearing
Gordon S Watson
Justice Critic, Party of Citizens
=========================
To : Paul Fromm at CAFÉ
Having been in maximum security for non-violent expression of my political beliefs, I am sympathetic to Terry Tremaine, yet I am pessimistic about his situation. Let me make it perfectly clear to all-concerned that I do not cleave to the philosophy of the National Socialist party. My father, and my uncles were bloodied wearing the uniform of the Dominion of Canada at war with the Third Reich. Immediately behind the front lines, my mother nursed broken men, from both sides of the battle. My grandfather was gassed at Ypres. My citizenship has been bought and paid-for in blood, sweat and tears. So I will not put up with anyone gainsaying my motive as I speak up for one whose right to equal treatment under the law is being trampled.
I tell people : 'if there's one thing you do NOT want to get tangled-up in, it's contempt of Court'. I've been through four contempt proceedings. One of which I won. I had a ringside seat for the trial of lawyer Jack Cram, whose case is one of the leading cases on that topic.
As you're finding out, the judiciary has all power when it perceives itself to be affronted. Often, after a dissident does fairly well in Court by using the show-trial to expose corruption, especially if he gets some publicity, the Powers-that-Be take off the velvet glove and apply the fist of steel. The rulebook is ditched and we see what totalitarianism looks like.
Those of us who were brought up to presume the British tradition of liberty under law, laugh at the rank hypocrisy, but the enemies of freedom lack the intellectual honesty to be embarrassed. There is nothing so useless it cannot at least be used as a bad example ; on the witness stand in a Human Wrongs hearing in Vancouver, I saw that personality disorder - miserable humor-less-ness - personified by the despicable Richard Warman
My all-time example of the utter perversion of Justice happened in 1994, arising out of the anti-abortion controversy. I made the judge issue a Judicial Notice acknowledging that, in the incident for which I was charged with contempt of an Order, I had been trying to stop a crime in progress = ie, a non-therapeutic surgery to execute a little baby / a sex-selection abortion ... by merely speaking to the father of the unborn girl = then he sent me to gaol for 21 days!
Since Dr Tremaine's illegal speech touches on the topic of 'race', it is worth mentioning that the East Indian father of the baby told me that they had had an ultrasound done to determine the child's sex. They were having her destroyed by the abortionists, so he didn’t have to come up with another dowry, since they already had one daughter. How's that for multi-cultural-ism, eh?
In the subsequent trial in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, I undid one of the great myths of feminism … that ‘abortion was decriminalized' in the Morgue&$$ case in 1988. Special Prosecutor Donald Sorochan had the decency to tell the court that he agreed with me, that section 163 (2) ( c ) of the Criminal Code is valid. Later, Denis Murray agreed too. Mr Murray having been the head of the Criminal Justice Branch in British Columbia, his opinion carries all the weight in the world. But the genocide against the white race goes on in the aborturaries as dissident voices are gaoled.
Human nature does not change … the race traitors, religious racketeers and vipers who sat in Moses’ seat in ancient Israel, incarcerated their critics then, and their descendants do it today.
When they get nervous about a dissident prevailing in the legal game, or getting traction for his ideas in the court of public opinion, the govt. plays the ‘contempt of Court’ card. As repugnant as it is, the ONLY way out of that charge is to go before the Court and grovel, so as to "purge the contempt".
A couple of years later, I stood before 3 Justices and said “I cannot apologize for trying to save the life of that little girl, but I have learned my lesson about contempt of Court, and I can promise you I won’t be back”. which satisfied them ; I did get to go home rather than serve out the sentence. So my maxim is : “any day you go to Court then get to go home and sleep in your own bed, is a good day”.
As far as the Court is concerned, the originating issue of how the Order came about, is irrelevant. You are only wasting your breath referring to it. All that does is confirm to the players in the legal racket that the Contemnor does not understand what's really going on. The Contemnor is not getting out of the coils of the Beast 'til the system feels that the disrepute into which his actions have brought it, has been remedied.
If the Contemnor cannot, in good conscience, do that much, then he will sit there indefinitely. First time I read that bit in the Criminal Code, it dawned on me how things are really done in this country, versus the Jewish fables we were told in the public fool system. It’s about the power of the Cult of the Black Robe ; all the rest is window-dressing
The glimmer of hope Terry Tremaine has as an argument to defend himself is that proceedings in Court are "qualified speech" ... specially-protected … thus outside the purview of a Court to prohibit. The fine point would be whether or not Dr Tremaine had actually filed the material at issue ... whether it had been stamped as received by the Clerk.
The members of the cult love such questions. Problem is ; it will take years for that one to grind its way up the rungs of the ladder of the Justice system. The enemies of free speech will be very happy to let him sit in prison and rot, meanwhile. Thus, he must agree with whatever bail condition the govt. demands. Because you simply cannot fight this stuff from inside their Castle
Gordon S Watson
Justice Critic, Party of Citizens
No comments:
Post a Comment